Archive for the ‘Separation’ Category

Nancy Schaefer

Nancy Schaefer

Nancy Schaefer, formerly a senator in Georgia, has become the standard bearer for many who have complaints against Child Protective Services, Social Service departments and other child welfare agencies which, collectively, are responsible for the disproportionate number of poor and Black children who have been taken into state custody and separated from their families unjustly.

In 2007, she issued “The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services,” a report in which she called for reform of the child welfare system, in Georgia specifically, but also nationwide.

In an address made on a yet-to-be-determined date, she blasted CPS and her comments were videotaped and ultimately placed on Youtube.  That video, however, was recently removed but is also available on Google, as seen below.

If, by some chance, the video is also removed from Google, excerpts from her speech are found below.

 …. for 4 years I’ve been confronted with families struggling to remove their children from the clutches of Child Protective Services [CPS]. I wrote a scathing report last year on the corruption in [CPS] … During the last session of the Georgia General Assembly, I introduced Senate Bill 415 relating to Juvenile proceedings …. It called for the time alloted for the Dept. of Human Resources to provide emergency care to a child without a court order to be reduced from 7 days to 72 hours. It required a court order to enter the residence of a parent or guardian to seize a child. It called for family court to be open to the public. Confidentiality and secrecy in family court protects the wrong people.

 

It provided that immunity in the system shall not extend to the seizures of children that are found to be in violation nor to the administration of medication to a child over the objection of the parent or custodian. And it provided the state from applying for obtaining, receiving or accepting adoption incentive payments under the Federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997.

 

The Dept. of [CPS] has become a protected empire built on taking children and separating families. This is not to say that there are not those children who do need to be removed from wretched situations and need protection, however, my report is concerned with the children and parents caught up in legal kidnapping. Having worked with probably 300 cases statewide and hundreds across the country and in nearly every state, I am convinced there is no accountability in [CPS].

 

I have come to several conclusions, 2 or 3 are, (1) Poor parents oftentimes are targeted to lose their children because they do not have the wherewithal to hire an atty and fight the system. The case workers and social workers are very often guilty of fraud, they withhold and destroy evidence, they fabricate evidence and they seek to terminate parental rights unnecessarily.

 

That the separation of families and the snatching of children is growing as the business grows because state and local government’s have grown accustomed to having these taxpayer dollars to balance their ever growing budgets. That the bureaucracy is huge, look at who is getting paid: state employees, attorneys, court investigators, guardian ad litems, court personnel and judges, psychologists, counselors, psychiatrists, therapists, foster parents, adoptive parents, etc. All are looking to the children in state custody to provide job security.

 

That the Adoption and Safe Families Act set in motion first in 1974 by Walter Mondale, later in 1997, by Pres. Bill Clinton, offered cash bonuses to the states for every child they adopted out of foster care. In order to receive the adoption incentive bonuses, local CPS would need more children. They must have merchandise that sells and they must have plenty so the buyer can choose. Some counties offer a $4-6000 bonus for each child adopted out to strangers and an additional $2000 for a special needs child. Employees work to keep the federal dollars flowing but that is only the beginning figure in the formula in which each bonus is multiplied by the percentage that the state has managed to exceed its baseline adoption number, therefore, states and local communities work hard to reach their goals for increased numbers of adoptions of children in foster care.

 

As you can see, this program is offered from the very top and is run by Health and Human Resources. This is why victims in CPS get no help from their legislators. It explains why my bill 415 suffered such defeat in the judicial committee and why I was cutoff at every junction and why I was defeated last month for reelection by another Republican.

 

That tax dollars are being used to keep this gigantic system afloat. Many grandparents have called me to get custody of their grandparents (sic) [should be grandchildren] before being lost in the system. Grandparents are losing their grandchildren to strangers; have lost their own flesh and blood. The children lose their family heritage and grandparents, and parents too, lose the connection of their heirs.

 

That the National Center of Child Abuse and Neglect in 1998 reported that 6 times more children died in foster care than in general public and that, once removed to official “safety,” these children are far more likely to suffer abuse – including sexual molestation – than in the general population. Think of what that number is today, 10 years later.

 

Here are a couple of recommendations on my list: call for an independent audit of all state [CPS] and for a federal congressional hearing on CPS. Abolish the federal and state financial incentives that have turned CPS into a business that separates families for money. I have witnessed such injustice and harm brought to so many families that I am not sure if reform of the system is even possible. The system cannot be trusted, it does not serve the people, it obliterates families and children simply because it has the power to do so.

 

What I have said to you in these few minutes is that we must confront the fraud in CPS. CPS seizes children using the very system that is paid for by the taxpayer who actually believes it is used to protect abused and neglected children. The bureaucracy of workers benefit financially by a system that converts children into cash while destroying their families and their lives. No child who emerges from the system can ever be sound or whole, many disappear and never are ever heard from again.

 

God will not stand for what is happening to our children and our families. His heart beats for these children, he will lift up the downtrodden. What is happening in America regarding CPS is a criminal, political phenomenon and it must be brought to an end. Please join me in working to help set our children and our families free.

>>>>>

Table of contents for CPS

  1. Child Protective Services & the Business of ‘Legalized Kidnapping’
  2. Former Senator’s Remarks on CPS
  3. Former Senator Says Child Protective Services Can’t Be Trusted

Parents Fight to Retrieve Their Children

by Adeeba Folami

DENVER - The suffering endured by Africans who were kidnapped from their native land and brought to America as slaves is sometimes referred to as the Black holocaust, which some say ended years ago but, that is not the case according to parents who have had their children taken from them by the Denver Department of Human Service (DDHS) or the Adams County Social Service Department (ACSSD). Jo Nash-Conner’s son Quentin, 10, currently resides at Mount St. Vincents Children’s Home (MSVCH), a facility which proclaims to provide programs and services to “help children with a wide range of emotional and behavioral problems.”

 

Jo Nash-Conner holds a 2-year-old photo in which she is pictured with her son Quentin who was taken from her last year.  She has not been allowed to see him for several weeks and calls the legalized kidnapping of CPS “modern day slavery” and a holocaust. (photos: Dakari Martin)

Jo Nash-Conner holds a 2-year-old photo in which she is pictured with her son Quentin who was taken from her last year. She has not been allowed to see him for several weeks and calls the legalized kidnapping of CPS “modern day slavery” and a holocaust. (photos: Dakari Martin)

Nash-Conner, however, has not found the center to be helpful and instead has been disallowed from visiting her son and has not seen him since February. The mother’s horror story began just over a year ago and is outlined in a typed statement entitled “A Declaration and A Desperate Mother’s Cry for Justice.”

 

“My 10-year-old son was kidnapped by the Child Protective Services (CPS) Department of DDHS on March 20, 2008,” she said. “My then 9-year-old son had walked away from our home on March 19, 2008 and was returned that evening by the Denver Police. I was informed that we would need to report to CPS for questioning the next day.”

 

So began the long journey which saw Quentin placed into two foster homes, the mental ward of Denver Health Medical Center (DHMC), back to a foster home, then to the Tennyson Home for Children (THC), the Ft. Logan Mental Hospital (FLMH), MSVCH, Children’s Hospital, back to Ft. Logan and then once again to MSVCH, where he is now. “All of this happened or is happening without my consent,” reads Nash-Conner’s statement. In an interview from her home, she explained she was originally charged with child abuse based on a CPS worker’s claim that marks were found on Quentin’s back and also that police said the boy accused his mother of hitting him.

 

Nash-Conner adamantly denied laying hands on her son and days later the charge was reduced to “wrongs to a child,” an offense she had no familiarity with nor could define. Five months later, that charge was dropped and the case closed, yet her son remains out of her custody and under the influence of several behavior-altering drugs which have been administered to him more than one year without her permission. They include Thorazine-which performs a chemical lobotomy; Depokote; Seroquel; Clonidine; Abilify; Ritalin and others.

 

Human rights commission involvement

 

Mark Carberry, a Case Documenter for the Citizen Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) said the organization’s investigation and review of medical records led them to file approximately 16 complaints regarding Quentin’s treatment and care. Four of those grievances pertained to DHMC; one each to THC and FLMH and a shocking ten complaints filed against MSVCH. Carberry said the first complaint was filed last June and the final one in January, citing not only concerns over the appearance of excessive drugging but that Quentin was taken to hospital emergency rooms three times; that his IQ decreased 19% from its 2004 level; that at MSVCH he had “therapeutic physical management” or “restraint” administered against him at least 41 times in less than a three month period. “He is a small, 10-year-old boy; at that time 4′6” and 82 pounds,” Carberry said, adding that the home’s records did not indicate the exact type of restraint the boy was subjected to. “They don’t say that somebody was sitting on his chest or back or if he was thrown down by three people,”

 

He went on to say that Quentin, during that time, was daily prescribed 750 mgs of Depokote, 10 mgs Abilify, 1 mg Clonidine, 100 mgs Docusate Sodium and 800 mgs Seroquel. “These cause aggressive and psychotic behaviors,” he said in his complaint. In her home, Nash-Conner pulled out her pocket sized Physician’s Desk Reference manual and opened to the page describing Seroquel. “Doses of 800 mgs or more per day have not been tested for safety,” the book reads. Her son’s vision, she said, was 20/20 before his nightmare began but now he is wearing bifocals and Carberry said it’s a likely result of the drugs being given since many of them list side effects that pertain to impaired vision.

 

Quentin’s mother broke down in tears while describing the painful ordeal and as an army veteran, she is angered that her family has been torn apart in a country for which she served. “I gave ten and one-half years of my life for this country and this kidnapping and drugging of my child is my thank you.”

 

One couple’s nightmare and loss of 3 children

 

DeAndre Rogers-El (l) and Samantha Goodson (r ) are in a battle for the return of their 3 children.  Initially compliant, they now are refusing to be treated like criminals required to undergo mental evaluations, classes and urinalysis testing.  A caseworker, this week, expressed his uncertainty that it was “appropriate” for them to be present with their 2-week-old daughter when she undergoes medical treatments they never approved but which were authorized by a judge.

DeAndre Rogers-El (l) and Samantha Goodson (r ) are in a battle for the return of their 3 children. Initially compliant, they now are refusing to be treated like criminals required to undergo mental evaluations, classes and urinalysis testing. A caseworker, this week, expressed his uncertainty that it was “appropriate” for them to be present with their 2-week-old daughter when she undergoes medical treatments they never approved but which were authorized by a judge.

With her were Samantha Goodson and her husband DeAndre Rogers-El, both 20 and parents to a newborn daughter, Ela-yuh, who has been in custody of ACSSD since her birth Apr. 8. The pair’s other children, Anyla, 2 and Brooklyn, 1, are in custody of DDHS and assigned to live in the home of the ex-girlfriend of Rogers-El’s mother. The young couple, who relocated from New York two years ago are very frustrated that their children have been taken from them based on allegations they say have nothing to do with child abuse. According to an Adams County court petition, the Denver case was opened due to the parents “being homeless and having their son with them on the street.” Also, reports were called in claiming the pair would drop their oldest daughter off with the grandmother and leave her. But Goodson and Rogers-El deny the allegation and say DDHS and ACSSD have used deception and underhanded tactics to build a fraudulent case against them.

 

They acknowledge having some trouble securing housing and temporarily moved in with Nash-Conner who gladly opened her home after meeting them at the weekly marches held outside DDHS offices near 12th and Federal Blvd. In late April, they moved into their own apartment; a step which should bring them closer to getting their children back, since another charge in the court document is that the couple showed “inability to provide stable housing and a safe environment for their children.”

 

While being interviewed, their caseworker called Nash-Conner’s home several times, initially telling them their baby was in the hospital and seeking their permission to allow surgery to correct the newborn’s club feet. Goodson expressed concerns that the medical personnel intended to break her child’s legs and felt it was too early to talk about surgery. Rogers-El told the caseworker he did not give permission for any procedures to be performed on his daughter, who had been brought in by the foster family that has cared for her since the day she was born. The caseworker said if the couple did not give permission, he would get it from the courts and later called back saying he had secured a judge’s order to proceed with treatments and that the child would be fitted for a cast that day and scheduled for surgery within nine weeks.

 

When pressed for more information, the caseworker revealed that the judge’s approval had been given that morning which led the couple to conclude that he had been dishonest with them by calling in the afternoon seeking their approval for something he knew a judge had already signed for. What was more puzzling to Rogers-El was that he and his wife had a custody hearing scheduled the following week at which the same judge who approved the surgery, was to decide whether to return their baby to them. He wondered aloud whether the decision had already been made, and not in his and Goodson’s favor.

 

Ela-yuh’s mother is still recovering from the C-section she had and described how she was kicked out of the hospital hours after the birth and before the foster parents came to take her baby away. “They told me I had to leave and I couldn’t see who was taking [the baby]. They made me sit in a room where security was sitting outside and made me stay there until she left. Then they put me out of the hospital,” she explained. “I wasn’t healed. I came home with tape on my stomach with an open wound.” She said she was never offered any follow up care, pain pills or medication.

 

Her husband said the way his daughter was taken, or “stolen” from the hospital was similar to how thieves work in the night. He recalls being in a rage and even at one point resorting to cursing. He warns parents-to-be to not let nurses take their newborns out of their sight. Goodson added that social services should not be trusted. “Don’t talk to them, don’t sign no papers,” she said. “They tell you they’re here for the benefit of your child; they’re not. They’re there to get paid extra for your child.”

 

Georgia senator lost seat after battling CPS

 

The same sentiment is shared by former Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer in a message she delivered entitled “The System Cannot be Trusted.” While in office, she waged a battle against CPS and introduced a senate bill designed to bring that agency under stricter regulation but the bill was defeated, as was she when up for re-election. In her message, she spoke strong words about how the taking of children, particularly from poor families, has become a lucrative business for CPS.

 

“I have come to several conclusions … Poor parents oftentimes are targeted to lose their children because they do not have the wherewithal to hire an attorney and fight the system,” Schaefer said in the video message which, until late April, was freely available for viewing on Youtube. “The caseworkers and social workers are very often guilty of fraud, they withhold and destroy evidence, they fabricate evidence and seek to terminate parental rights unnecessarily.” She went on to say that the separation of families and snatching of children is growing because the money brought in by taxpayer dollars is needed by states and local governments to balance their budgets. She said the bureaucracy is “huge” as indicated by the number of people profiting from legalized kidnapping: state employees, attorneys, court investigators, guardian ad litems, judges, psychiatrists, foster parents, adoptive parents, “all are looking to the children in state custody to provide job security,” Schaefer declared.

 

Carberry gave an example of just how much money is at play when he said that FLMH charges anywhere from $1400-1600 per day for care of a child like Quentin, which amounts to nearly $500,000 per year, covered by taxpayers through Medicare/Medicaid. He suggested that the child’s mother would be “ecstatic” if given just $2000 per month to care for her child in her own home but Nash-Conner, in agreement with Schaefer, has concluded that the system is too big and is bringing in too much money for people who do not want their cash flow disrupted.

 

She shared that mainstream media outlets have refused to look at her story or others like it and that she has not been able to locate an attorney who is willing to stand up against such a machine. She has had no response from the offices of the governor or the mayor and was saddened by the reaction she received from Senator Peter Groff who did not take the time to hear her story or take her number to follow up. Groff, who is the first Black to become President of Colorado’s Senate, recently resigned to take a position in Washington, D.C. as part of President Barack Obama’s Department of Education.

 

Nash-Conner, Goodson and Rogers-El remain hopeful and confident that their children will be returned to them eventually but strongly encourage those who are apathetic or unaware of what is going on to become informed before it is too late and their own children are ‘kidnapped’ and caught up in the system.

 

One of Schaefer’s most startling statements is one which leaves little room for hope that things will improve any time soon. “I have witnessed such injustice and harm brought to so many families that I am not sure if reform of the system is even possible,” she said. “The system cannot be trusted, it does not serve the people, it obliterates families and children simply because it has the power to do so.”

© 2009 – All Rights Reserved – The Black House News
Unlimited online distribution allowed with acknowledgement of bhonline.org as the source

>>>>>

Many around the world have been swayed by the Christian teaching that the Jews, or Israelites, are the “chosen people” of God and because of this, some hold the Jewish people – those of European descent – in a higher regard than other groups of people. But what if the world has been deceived by a diversionary tactic and teaching which was intended to keep the world’s population blinded as to who the true chosen people are?

 

 

Obadiyah Ysrayl (OY), a regent of the Israelite Heritage organization, and a long-time Hebrew Israelite, recently traveled from Chicago, Illinois to speak in Denver, Colorado about the hidden history and how Blacks in America are the people who fulfill many Biblical prophecies which have long been applied to European Jewish history. He was interviewed by The Black House News’ (BHN) Adeeba Folami prior to his June lecture at a local cultural center.

__________________

 

(BHN) – What are some of the things you’re going to speak about in your message today?

(OY) - What I deal with is the hidden history between the Bible and African American history. There is a connection between the ancient Biblical Israelites and the so-called Black people of the Americas, in fact, this relationship was always known by our slave masters – this is one of the reasons they put us through what’s called the seasoning process, to remove knowledge of self. They removed our language, history – everything – and so we’re gonna show from the Bible, from history and archeology, that not only African Americans, but Jamaicans, Haitians, all of us that were brought into the Western Hemisphere with the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, we are Israelites.

 

I’m going to show first the physical appearance and then we’ll show the curses and punishments that the Most High put upon His children, the children of Israel, in fact, it’s our entire history in the Western Hemisphere from slavery. The Bible speaks about we’re gonna be brought into slavery in ships and be sold to our enemies as male and female slaves. It talks about us having a prison population and said, ‘you’re gonna be hid in prison houses.’ It talks about we’re gonna be a disease stricken people, which we are; we lead in 8 of the top 10 cancers; sickle cell anemia and so many of these diseases on us, they’re starting to call them Black diseases; so we’re gonna go through that and show why all these things have happened.

 

We’re not only gonna say this and that is happening to us but [we will give] the cause and the reason. It’s because we left the Most High. He chose us to be his priests, his teachers to the world and we turned our back and said we don’t want to teach the world but we want to be like the world. We were integrating long ago. We tried integration. Integration didn’t work in the 60s and it didn’t work 2000 – 3000 years ago because the Most High said, ‘I called you to be a separate people, to be different from these people because you got to be an example to them.’ That’s what our lecture will deal with today.

 

(BHN) – You spoke of separation and the Nation of Islam also advocates separation. How are you and the NOI on the same page on that subject?

(OY) - I’m familiar with the Nation of Islam teachings, in fact, before I came into this, I was searching and I came across some of the teachings. Yes, separation is Biblical for our people because the Most High is a separatist Himself. He said, ‘I called you,’ and I’m gonna show the scriptures, Ex. 19:5-6, He said, ‘I called you to be a people unto Me. I don’t want you to be like that.’ Right now, integration has killed our people and we never thought about this; we’re fighting for the right to integrate with a wicked people. That means if they’re wicked and we’re gonna integrate with them, we’re gonna be wicked [also.]

 

The NOI has that right: total separation, we’re talking about a total, total, total separation. I mean, eventually we’re gonna have to separate from this land because this land will be destroyed by the Most High. So we’re similar on that understanding that separation, really, for the survival of our people, separation has to happen. We got to give these people back everything – their names, their ways, their customs. It was never meant for us and it’s killing us.

 

(BHN) – Thank you.

© 2008 – All Rights Reserved – The Black House News
Unlimited online distribution allowed with acknowledgement of bhonline.org as the source

 

 

op-ed by Adeeba Folami

Something remarkable is happening and it centers around presidential candidate Barack Obama who defied the odds and emerged from Super Tuesday in a near tie with opponent Sen. Hillary Clinton. He – viewed as the first “viable” Black candidate – is giving Clinton, the first “viable” female candidate, more of a challenge than had been expected. Voters have been turning out in record numbers and Obama is credited with energizing large numbers of supporters under 30 who are voting for and supporting him in grand fashion.

 

The Democratic race has turned into a red carpet, A-list, who’s who contest in which both candidates are receiving endorsements of high-profile Black figures like Oprah, Magic Johnson, Stevie Wonder, Usher, and even rapper 50 cent came out announcing support for Clinton. The reaction of many might be, ‘What does Mr. In-Da-Club know about politics?’ but because the Obama/Clinton competition is now Hollywoodized, it seems endorsing one or the other candidate has become the latest “flava of the month” fad. It also has shown the division amongst Blacks who are torn between supporting a Black man versus a White woman who is married to one previously joked to be the “first Black president.”

 

Martin Luther King III recently said that regardless who wins the White House, the condition of the masses will remain unchanged. This has historically been the case so why are many Blacks acting as though Obama is the second coming of Jesus and a saving grace? As inspirational of a speaker as he may be, as thrilled as many are that his skin tone is similar to theirs, reality is that Obama does not have a good record of speaking or voting in favor of things which could possibly benefit Blacks.

 

In many quarters of Black America there are sane and sensible reasons for Black voters to question whether Obama will represent them,” writes Bruce Dixon, Managing Editor of The Black Agenda Report. He continued in his online column entitled, Black America’s Real Issue With Barack Obama: “Many remember his first act as Senator was to refuse to stand with the Congressional Black Caucus and Senator Barbara Boxer in opposition to Ohio’s nullification of hundreds of thousands of black votes.” He goes on to cite mass incarceration of Blacks as a major issue of concern but one which no CBC members, including the Senator, publicly question. “We do have issues that matter to us, and if Obama does not address them, he is truly somebody else’s candidate, not ours

 

But many Obama supporters accuse his critics of “hating” because his success, they say, dispels the notion that Blacks can’t rise above and is reason to silence the cries of discrimination and inequality in this society. Some are quick to remind that no Black person can win the White House campaigning on Black issues, i.e., no strong Black person who identifies with the plight of Blacks in this land has a chance of being supported or heard on a scale large enough to become president.

 

So it seems Black Obama supporters are content to settle for crumbs, as they historically have in the political process, in order to jump on the campaign bandwagon and scream “Yes we can” with all the non-Blacks who they are hoping will usher Obama into the presidency. Many of them do not expect Obama to address any “Black issues” but emphasize the important precedent that will be set just by him being elected. That’s fine but imagine the powerful force that would be produced if Blacks were able to unite together – rather than being divided over 2 candidates – to creatively address and come up with solutions to the many issues they continue to face in America. It’s as if many have already forgotten that just a few weeks ago, nooses were turning up all over the country. Obama-mania has erased relatively recent events in Jena, Louisiana and South Carolina. It’s as if the Hurricane Katrina response never occurred in 2005 in which it was clear that Black concerns had been thrown off the back burner and were no longer on America’s stove.

 

Some seem to believe that because one Black man, who is being pushed as a multi-cultural (integrationist, we are one people) candidate, is being supported countrywide by people of all backgrounds, that somehow changes things for the Black masses. It doesn’t and really only re-enforces what Nation of Islam leader Elijah Muhammad said decades ago in the Muslim Program which advocates separation as the only solution for the descendants of slaves in America. He wrote:

 

“We believe the offer of integration is hypocritical and is made by those trying to deceive black peoples into believing their 400-year-old open enemies are, all of a sudden, their “friends.” Furthermore, we believe that such deception is intended to prevent black people from realizing that the time in history has arrived for separation from the whites of this nation.”

© 2008 – All Rights Reserved – The Black House News
Unlimited online distribution allowed with acknowledgement of bhonline.org as the source

by Adeeba Folami

 

In the Bible, there is a story about a poor man named Lazarus who shamelessly laid at the feet of a rich and powerful man, begging daily for the crumbs off of that self-sufficient man’s dinner table. The rich man looked upon this beggar with great disdain as the beggar lacked ability and/or vision to make a better reality for himself. This Biblical story is what may come to the minds of some analyzing recent events in New Orleans where activists and protesters are fighting to save four large public housing projects, destroyed by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, from the demolition officially approved by the city council on Dec. 20.

 

As heart breaking as the stories are in the documentary “This Is My Home,” which outlines the long legal battle former public housing residents have been waging against HUD and the city’s housing authority; as sincere as the Brothers and Sisters are about wanting to be allowed to move back in, the fact remains that they are fighting – getting pepper sprayed and stunned by police; chaining themselves to bulldozers in protest – to save run down “projects,” the only homes some of the residents ever knew prior to Katrina. Yet again, – all that valuable time and energy is being exerted not to save fancy, high quality homes but to save projects which are the crumbs of American housing. Sincere as our beautiful people in the Big Easy are, do they see the parallel of their efforts to those of Lazarus, the poor man laying and begging at the rich man’s gate?

 

It is said that 12,000 homeless are now camping out in tents across from the New Orleans City Hall and camped out for what reason? In essence, begging to be given something by a supposed-to-be rich and benevolent master who clearly cares nothing for them.

 

How much more will it take before we as Black people give the finger to the rich man, STAND UP and set forth to do and build something for ourselves? What do we have to lose? How long will we continue laying at the feet of the American government begging for a justice that is never going to come from it? We have been laying at this uncaring, rich man’s door for over 400 years and have not been given any reason to believe he is ever going to respect us as long as we are at his feet begging for the worst his society has to offer. FEEL that – the worst his society has to offer is what we are begging and fighting for, in some cases because that is all we have ever been able to view as our own.

 

As always in these separation-themed commentaries, we come back to Elijah Muhammad’s Muslim Program in which he, in the 1960s, advocated complete separation between the descendants of slaves in America and the Whites of this nation. Are we ready to seriously consider his plans or are we content to continue being jerked around like helpless puppets on a string always controlled by another force? We are protesting in New Orleans and Jena, Louisiana; West Virginia; D.C. and in New York. Some observers suggest that, sightings of alleged hooded, government provocateurs at many of these protests, (some even photographed in New Orleans last week), is proof that these agents are attempting to escalate friction between police and protesters as a means of inciting a level of violence which would allow martial law or a police state to be imposed. Are we going to oblige them by taking chances with our oft-repeated protests?

 

In cities all over this country we are in a continual state of stress, forever reacting to some new crisis or case of discrimination. Is it even possible for a people to truly thrive and progress in such environment? If not, is it time to take these words of Elijah Muhammad out of books and papers and fight like hell to make them reality:

 

 

“…..We want our people in America whose parents or grandparents were descendants from slaves, to be allowed to establish a separate state or territory of their own – either on this continent or elsewhere.  We believe that our former slave masters are obligated to provide such land and that the area must be fertile and  minerally rich.  We believe that our former slave masters are obligated to maintain and supply our needs in this separate territory for the next 20-25 years – until we are able to produce and supply our own needs.  Since we cannot get along with them in peace and equality, after giving them 400 years of our sweat and blood and receiving in return some of the worst treatment human beings have ever experienced, we believe our contributions to this land and the suffering forced upon us by white America, justifies our demand for complete separation in a state or territory of our own….

“We believe that the offer of integration is hypocritical and is made by those who are trying to deceive the black peoples into believing that their 400-year-old open enemies of freedom, justice and equality are, all of a sudden, their “friends.” Furthermore, we believe that such deception is intended to prevent black people from realizing that the time in history has arrived for the separation from the whites of this nation….”

- Elijah Muhammad, The Muslim Program

© 2007 – All Rights Reserved – The Black House News
Unlimited online distribution allowed with acknowledgement of bhonline.org as the source