Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Table of contents for CPS

  1. Child Protective Services & the Business of ‘Legalized Kidnapping’
  2. Former Senator’s Remarks on CPS
  3. Former Senator Says Child Protective Services Can’t Be Trusted

The system cannot be trusted” is a phrase former Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer (NS) continues to use in reference to Child Protective Services (CPS), a.k.a. Child Welfare, a.k.a Social Services. Government child welfare agencies are out of control, she maintains, as a result of President Walter Mondale’s 1974 Adoption and Safe Families Act which has turned “child welfare” into big business. Financial incentives – into the millions of dollars – are benefiting most states and come in the form of assistance for foster care and adoption services.

 

Schaefer’s battle against CPS began five years ago and led her to introduce Bill 415 in 2008, calling for significant changes in the CPS system. She continues to fight today, although no longer an elected official and she serves as President of Georgia’s Eagle Forum and is the group’s National Chairman for Parents’ Rights. She recently spoke with The Black House News’ (BHN) Adeeba Folami about her current views and advocacy efforts.

(BHN) – You were an advocate, when you were a senator, of reform in the CPS system. Give a summary of what you’re doing in that area now that you’re no longer a senator.

(NS) – I am hearing from so many people across the country that are having great difficulty with Child Protective Services and many people have lost their children, many people are losing their children and it’s just continuing to keep me busy in this issue. I am working on some publications about it, am also considering writing a book about this as I have quite a lot of resources that I have put together. It’s a situation that looks as though [CPS] is just a protected empire built on taking children and separating families.

 

This is not to say that there are not those children who do need to be removed from horrible, wretched situations. I think all of us do agree that those children need to be removed but what I’m concerned about now is the fact that [CPS] is taking children from families unnecessarily. Many of them are taking children for the money. There are financial incentives that come down from the federal government and it’s just been turned into a business.

 

When I first went to the Senate in the state of Georgia, I was not aware of this but I had several mothers and a grandmother, in particular, that came to me about their situation and I listened to them and they were telling me the truth. That was 5 years ago and one grandmother, to this day, has still yet to be able to get her grandchildren back to her and to their mother who was so traumatized when her 2 little girls were taken from her. That was the beginning of my coming into play in this issue. Those 2 little girls were literally placed in a foster home where there were 18 children and there was a pedophile case worker who lived in the home. The situation was absolutely horrible and was covered up and is covered up to this day.

 

Then there was another county in my district that had an unbelievable rate of removing children and so I got involved in that county. I had some officials come in to listen to 37 in this ONE county tell their story and it was heart breaking and heart wrenching to hear them tell the story of how their children had been removed off of school buses, out of hospitals, out of their homes in the middle of the night; how terrorized this county had been because of [CPS]. They even had a business operating within the Department of [CPS] where they were making extra money by requiring parents to have 10 or 15 drug tests and the parents had to pay for it. They already had made over $100,000 and that was just in one county in my district.

 

From there, I have gone to cases all over the state of Georgia, now cases all over the United States and even into foreign countries who are patterning themselves after [CPS] in the United States, so it is a situation that has got to be dealt with and it probably needs to be dealt with on a federal level. The financial incentives that are there to take children, move them around in foster care and adopt them out for bonuses needs to be brought to an end.

 

(BHN) – The Manager of of Human Services in Denver calls it an outrage to suggest that CPS, Child Welfare, is making money off of the system. What would you say to that statement coming from someone in her position?

(NS) – Maybe she is a very fine person and maybe she does not do anything like this. I’m sure there are pockets across the country where the employees with [CPS] are good people and want to protect children and do the right thing but the overall picture across the country is taking children unnecessarily for the money and it is everywhere and it is rampant. As a matter of fact, I was just reading over the weekend about something …. the finances that are going through the family court where many of these deprivation cases are presented, families are never allowed to speak up, the parents are never allowed to say anything at all. This was a report made by the Census Bureau in 2002 where they stated that $40 billion in transfer payments were made between households and that money is under the direction and control of Family Court judges. That’s 40 billion [dollars], so money’s involved here and if anyone wanted to go back, look at the formula that is developed for individual states based on a baseline number of expected adoptions, which is based on the population of the state, you can begin to see how the finances come into play. All of that goes back to the Adoption and Safe Families Act that was set in motion in 1974 by Walter Mondale. Later, in 1997, Pres. [Bill] Clinton enlarged upon that act and offered cash bonuses to the states for every child they adopted out of foster care.

 

I think it was Walter Mondale, when he passed that act he said, ‘I hope this doesn’t turn into a business.’ Well it is a business and if you’re gonna get cash bonuses for every child you adopt out, then you’re gonna need more children and as I have said in my report, from all the cases that I have seen, I would say the majority, it’s those who are poor, who cannot afford to hire an attorney and cannot afford to fight the system, who are targeted. I have seen children removed because the mother fed her children three times at McDonalds in one week; children have been removed because the family didn’t have bunk beds; children have been removed because the home was not as adequate as it ought to be according to [CPS]. But some of the money that [CPS] has could go to helping a family improve their home and keep their children; help a single mom who is struggling to keep a roof over her head and food on the table and keep up a job and look after her children, but the situation is completely out of control and there is no place for these families to turn to get help.

 

(BHN) – For some of those reasons you were citing that children were taken out of homes, was that completely up to case worker discretion or were these things written into policy?

(NS) – There are all different kinds of ways. Nearly every [CPS] Dept. in every state is probably different. They’re even different from county to county but what is so incredible is the power they have. They can come into the home, they can knock the door down and come in even without a warrant and take these children and remove the children even in the middle of the night or with children kicking and screaming, because they have the power to do so and [CPS] should not have that kind of power. There should not be that financial incentive for social workers to take children.

 

(BHN) – When you mentioned bonuses, does that have anything to do with block grants?

(NS) – There are state grants and there are federal grants and the cash bonuses are given to the states for every child that is adopted out to foster care and then, in order to receive the adoption incentive bonuses, local [CPS] has to have the children and so some counties are known to give 4000 to 6000 [dollar] bonus for each child adopted out to strangers and an additional 2000 for a special needs child. Then, of course, if you have special needs children, you adopt them out, often times those children are put on medication – then Medicaid comes into play and then there’s more money.

 

(BHN) – If someone wanted to track this, if you looked at an agency’s records, would something show up as “bonus” or what would you be looking at specifically?

(NS) – You could possibly go to the state and get a recording, a record, statement of the funding that comes into the state, where the funding comes from, how much [it] is. Sometimes that is hard to get but the funding continues as long as the child is out of the home. There is funding when the child is placed with a new family and then if the child is to be adopted out, adoption bonus funds are available. When the child is placed in a mental health facility and is put on drugs, and I had a family in my own district where 2 children in one family were on 16 drugs a day. The cases are unending and the program is ordered from the very top, it’s run by Health and Human Services.

 

(BHN) – In the video address available on YouTube, you said something like, sometimes you wonder if there’s any hope that the system can be changed. Is there really any hope?

(NS) – Well, I really feel that it should be completely closed and start over without financial incentives and strictly to protect those children who are truly abused and need to be removed and find the proper care for them. As it is now, there is such injustice, they just use the words “in the best interest of the child” over and over and over when the child has never even been considered. In the best interest of the child has now been redefined. It’s really not in the best interest of the child. I don’t think any child that comes out of the foster care system can ever be really whole again. They suffer so terribly and if I gave you case after case after case, you would just be overwhelmed because of the tragedy of it.

 

I really do not believe that reform of the system is possible, it cannot be trusted as I put it in one of my reports. It does not serve the people, it obliterates families and children simply because it has the power to do so and honestly, I don’t think the taxpayers understand the big picture of [CPS]. If they did, they would pull the house down because all of these financial incentives are taxpayer dollars and that’s why this whole situation with [CPS] needs to be completely exposed and dealt with. I really think, more than likely, that having gone on so long that it probably should be completely shut down and started over.

 

(BHN) – What kind of opposition and backlash did you receive for taking the stance that you did as a senator and even now?

(NS) – I had a bill in the General Assembly here in Georgia, in the Senate, that got sidetracked because of what it was talking about. It was trying to open Family Court and I was trying to remove immunity from case workers so they would have to be held responsible for what they’ve done and it had 4-5 very good points and at the last minute, it was sidetracked, a substitute was written in place of the one I wanted to have introduced and of course, the substitute just stripped my bill of the important points. It also cost me my next election as we have learned in many different ways that the powers that be had bearing on that election, but I haven’t worried about that at all because I really have felt like it freed me up to spend some time on this issue, to work on a book so that I can get the truth out and can really give some real illustrations of what different families are going through and what they are dealing with.

 

As it is right now, it’s like CPS is out of control and we need to change it but no one ever really focuses on the exact examples of what families are going through and I would like to put some real illustrations of what I’ve seen and what is happening and how really desperate these families are.

 

 

(BHN) – Is the Eagle Forum a group advocating for reform of CPS?
(NS) -
No, Eagle Forum of Georgia deals with many issues and there is an Eagle Forum nearly in every state and there’s a national Eagle Forum. I am the Eagle Forum National Chairman for Parents Rights and so I do tie parents rights to this crisis because I feel like parents don’t get a fair shake. We’re seeing judges, guardian ad litems and court appointed attorneys all tied together when money is involved and parents are just left out in the cold and not allowed to speak or they don’t have parental rights and that’s why I believe that Family Court should be open, the press should be able to come in, family members should be able to come in and, before a child is removed from a home, a relative should absolutely be found for the child to at least stay with a little while. Many changes need to be made and many good changes can be made but a lot needs to be accomplished.

 

The state does not need to become the parent. Parents need to be strengthened, the home needs to be strengthened and our families need to be under-girded by all that we’re doing, not just torn apart at the seams and disintegrated. Families are being disintegrated in [CPS].

 

(BHN) – Is there any type of network set up or a hotline where people can call to get assistance or what would you advise?

(NS) – Well, I do know that there are little pockets roundabout of people who are trying to help families. I learn more about them all the time and people can go on the internet and find some of those pockets and places where they can get help. Certainly we don’t mind if someone contacts us if they have a serious situation. What we try to do is maybe find someone in their state that can help them.

 

What has been very disheartening to me is that I have tried to call senators and legislators in other states to see if they would help this particular family or that particular family and they have said no to me because they fear losing their job. I thought I was an isolated case until I talked to other state representatives and senators and realized that they did not particularly want to get involved with this issue because they were fearful of losing their jobs, so it’s been hard to get other state reps and other state senators involved. I’ve been able to accomplish a good bit by working through different ones that I have known over the years in different states who’ve been able to locate some attorneys willing to take these families and help, under-gird and go to bat for them. Some will do a little pro bono work and then there are those attorneys who know that if the family cannot pay them, they won’t take the case at all.

 

That’s why I feel that the targeting of the poor family, who does not have the wherewithal to fight the system, are the ones that are suffering the most and it has just got to be brought to an end.

 

(BHN) – Where is the pressure coming from specifically? You say the elected representatives are afraid of losing their jobs. Are we talking about big corporations being involved?

(NS) – We’re talking about money coming into the states, we’re talking about money that makes up the budget in the state, we’re talking about states that don’t want to have to handle this situation. They don’t want to acknowledge that this is going on and it’s coming down from the top, this is coming down from the Dept. of Human Resources, it’s coming down from a federal level and that’s where the incentives were created and those incentives need to be cut off. There shouldn’t be a cash bonus for someone who works for [CPS] to adopt a child out. Eventually, that is going to become a business and the more children you adopt out, the more children you take from the home, the more children that you put in foster care – and there’s money for foster care. There’s money for foster care, for foster care parents, there’s money for the adoptive parents. There’s money as long as the child is there, until he’s 18. The money that we’re talking about is millions and millions of dollars in the states, this is money that the states are dependent on. They don’t want to give up that money. They don’t want anyone investigating [CPS] but the stories that families are going through in losing their children, are horror stories.

 

What children are going through being put in families with strangers, the statistics are already that many more children are abused in foster care than in their homes, even if their home is not perfect. More children are abused, more children are sexually abused, more children die in foster care than in their own homes, even when their homes are not perfect so .. we just can’t take money and make money off of the backs of children. Children should be protected and we all should be working together to protect these children and be sure that all of these horrible situations are brought to an end.

 

(BHN) – Have you been moved to tears by any cases?

(NS) – Oh yeah. Oh yeah. In the beginning we had people call and we must have had 50 calls a day, or more, and some of them, we just were moved to tears over the phone talking to parents and then sometimes after I had talked to maybe 20 families in one day, I was so sick that I could barely sleep at night. It was almost more than anyone could stand and it’s almost more than anyone can believe now. That’s why I feel that writing this book is very important because I can start at the very beginning. I can tell the people who came to me right at the very beginning and told me what had happened to their grandchildren. Then, in that same county, I learned of more and more children and then more and more children until I was just absolutely overwhelmed and then it spread and it went all across Georgia and then into other states.

 

(BHN) – Thank you.

© 2009 – All Rights Reserved – The Black House News
Unlimited online distribution allowed with acknowledgement of bhonline.org as the source

>>>>>

Nancy Schaefer

Nancy Schaefer

Nancy Schaefer, formerly a senator in Georgia, has become the standard bearer for many who have complaints against Child Protective Services, Social Service departments and other child welfare agencies which, collectively, are responsible for the disproportionate number of poor and Black children who have been taken into state custody and separated from their families unjustly.

In 2007, she issued “The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services,” a report in which she called for reform of the child welfare system, in Georgia specifically, but also nationwide.

In an address made on a yet-to-be-determined date, she blasted CPS and her comments were videotaped and ultimately placed on Youtube.  That video, however, was recently removed but is also available on Google, as seen below.

If, by some chance, the video is also removed from Google, excerpts from her speech are found below.

 …. for 4 years I’ve been confronted with families struggling to remove their children from the clutches of Child Protective Services [CPS]. I wrote a scathing report last year on the corruption in [CPS] … During the last session of the Georgia General Assembly, I introduced Senate Bill 415 relating to Juvenile proceedings …. It called for the time alloted for the Dept. of Human Resources to provide emergency care to a child without a court order to be reduced from 7 days to 72 hours. It required a court order to enter the residence of a parent or guardian to seize a child. It called for family court to be open to the public. Confidentiality and secrecy in family court protects the wrong people.

 

It provided that immunity in the system shall not extend to the seizures of children that are found to be in violation nor to the administration of medication to a child over the objection of the parent or custodian. And it provided the state from applying for obtaining, receiving or accepting adoption incentive payments under the Federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997.

 

The Dept. of [CPS] has become a protected empire built on taking children and separating families. This is not to say that there are not those children who do need to be removed from wretched situations and need protection, however, my report is concerned with the children and parents caught up in legal kidnapping. Having worked with probably 300 cases statewide and hundreds across the country and in nearly every state, I am convinced there is no accountability in [CPS].

 

I have come to several conclusions, 2 or 3 are, (1) Poor parents oftentimes are targeted to lose their children because they do not have the wherewithal to hire an atty and fight the system. The case workers and social workers are very often guilty of fraud, they withhold and destroy evidence, they fabricate evidence and they seek to terminate parental rights unnecessarily.

 

That the separation of families and the snatching of children is growing as the business grows because state and local government’s have grown accustomed to having these taxpayer dollars to balance their ever growing budgets. That the bureaucracy is huge, look at who is getting paid: state employees, attorneys, court investigators, guardian ad litems, court personnel and judges, psychologists, counselors, psychiatrists, therapists, foster parents, adoptive parents, etc. All are looking to the children in state custody to provide job security.

 

That the Adoption and Safe Families Act set in motion first in 1974 by Walter Mondale, later in 1997, by Pres. Bill Clinton, offered cash bonuses to the states for every child they adopted out of foster care. In order to receive the adoption incentive bonuses, local CPS would need more children. They must have merchandise that sells and they must have plenty so the buyer can choose. Some counties offer a $4-6000 bonus for each child adopted out to strangers and an additional $2000 for a special needs child. Employees work to keep the federal dollars flowing but that is only the beginning figure in the formula in which each bonus is multiplied by the percentage that the state has managed to exceed its baseline adoption number, therefore, states and local communities work hard to reach their goals for increased numbers of adoptions of children in foster care.

 

As you can see, this program is offered from the very top and is run by Health and Human Resources. This is why victims in CPS get no help from their legislators. It explains why my bill 415 suffered such defeat in the judicial committee and why I was cutoff at every junction and why I was defeated last month for reelection by another Republican.

 

That tax dollars are being used to keep this gigantic system afloat. Many grandparents have called me to get custody of their grandparents (sic) [should be grandchildren] before being lost in the system. Grandparents are losing their grandchildren to strangers; have lost their own flesh and blood. The children lose their family heritage and grandparents, and parents too, lose the connection of their heirs.

 

That the National Center of Child Abuse and Neglect in 1998 reported that 6 times more children died in foster care than in general public and that, once removed to official “safety,” these children are far more likely to suffer abuse – including sexual molestation – than in the general population. Think of what that number is today, 10 years later.

 

Here are a couple of recommendations on my list: call for an independent audit of all state [CPS] and for a federal congressional hearing on CPS. Abolish the federal and state financial incentives that have turned CPS into a business that separates families for money. I have witnessed such injustice and harm brought to so many families that I am not sure if reform of the system is even possible. The system cannot be trusted, it does not serve the people, it obliterates families and children simply because it has the power to do so.

 

What I have said to you in these few minutes is that we must confront the fraud in CPS. CPS seizes children using the very system that is paid for by the taxpayer who actually believes it is used to protect abused and neglected children. The bureaucracy of workers benefit financially by a system that converts children into cash while destroying their families and their lives. No child who emerges from the system can ever be sound or whole, many disappear and never are ever heard from again.

 

God will not stand for what is happening to our children and our families. His heart beats for these children, he will lift up the downtrodden. What is happening in America regarding CPS is a criminal, political phenomenon and it must be brought to an end. Please join me in working to help set our children and our families free.

>>>>>

Are Blacks Overreacting to NY Post Cartoon?

  • No. It's offensive no matter what the artist meant (67%, 6 Votes)
  • Yes. The monkey was not representing Obama (22%, 2 Votes)
  • Not Sure (11%, 1 Votes)
  • Other (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 9

Loading ... Loading ...
 

 (poll expires in 30 days)

Last week, a political cartoon ran in the New York Post which caused a stir in the Black community with many saying it was a racist commentary meant to suggest the assassination of President Barack Obama.  The cartoon depicted a monkey being shot by two officers who made the comment, “They’ll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill.”

Feb. 18 NY Post Cartoon

Feb. 18 NY Post Cartoon

Outrage over the cartoon came from the NAACP – whose leader called for a boycott of the paper and the firing of an editor; activist Al Sharpton, entertainer Spike Lee, musician John Legend and others.  The common assumption being that Obama was depicted as the monkey; however, that does not seem to add up to the reality that authorship of the stimulus package has never been credited to the President.  Instead, critics say House Speaker Nancy Pelosi or “the Democrats” are responsible for penning the economic rescue plan signed into law by Obama in mid-February.

So, are some in the Black community overreacting based on emotionalism,  assumption, and old scars rather than consideration of the facts or is the use of a monkey in any political imagery off limits now for four years simply because a Black man is in the White House; when use of the monkey has not been off limits before? 

Some have an entirely different interpretation of the cartoon and the artist’s intention:

….The cartoon satirized the story of a chimpanzee that was shot to death by the police after attacking a friend of its owner. The cartoonist implied that the dead chimp had written the federal stimulus package that President Obama had just signed into law…..

Brent Staples said in “The Ape in American Bigotry; From Thomas Jefferson to 2009,” an editorial published in the New York Times. Was it as simple as that or should Blacks truly be outraged and insulted over this political satire which occurs every day in various media formats? 

>>>>>

Op-ed by Adeeba Folami

 

Big Pimpin' was the 2000 hit song by Rapper Jay-Z.

Big Pimpin' was the 2000 hit song by Rapper Jay-Z.

“We be big pimpin’, spendin’ cheese. We be big pimpin’ on B-L-A-Ds…,” rapper Jay-Z rhymed in his 2000 hit song “Big Pimpin.” Who knew that nine years later the song’s hook about “spendin’ cheese,” i.e., money, could very well be used as the theme for Barack Obama’s inauguration. The historic swearing in of the first Black president is being celebrated with five days’ worth of activities estimated to cost over $150 million despite the country being in an economic crisis.

 

Barack Obama is Big Pimpin' his presidential inauguration with its $150+ price tag.

Barack Obama is Big Pimpin' his presidential inauguration with its $150+ million price tag.

Many believe the significance of Obama taking office justifies the inaugural price tag and it is easy to imagine them joining Jay-Z in his chorus, “We be big pimpin’, spendin’ cheese. We be big pimpin’ on B-L-A-Ds…,” B-L-A-Ds being the 20-inch tire rims found on the rides of those who like to show off their status with the wheel accessories; each one costing thousands of dollars. Obama may not be big pimpin on those rims but he turned many heads during his Jan. 17 Philadelphia-to-D.C.-Big Pimpin Express train ride to Washington. Huge crowds of people were seen waving as the train made it’s way down the east coast stopping in several cities where Obama made brief speeches, casting out more of the promises made during his campaign. Similarly, Jay-Z’s Big Pimpin’ video has the rapper casting dolla-bills out to throngs of people as he’s standing atop an expensive yacht.

 

Unlike Jay-Z, who spends his own cheese when big pimpin’, taxpayers will primarily cover Obama’s inaugural costs; along with the near $30-40 million given by private donors, including many celebrities and corporate business executives. Plus, outgoing President George W. Bush declared the inauguration a “national emergency” so that federal emergency funds, which otherwise would be used (and may be in demand later) for natural or other disasters, could be released to help cover the millions needed to pay for adequate security. Initial estimates suggested that up to five million people would descend on the nation’s capital Jan. 20 to see Obama sworn-in but that number has been reduced to 2-3 million.

 

In some ways the number of singers, actors, rappers and “big names” who plan to attend activities make the event seem like another Hollywood production or awards show. Even Entertainment Tonight, the entertainment world’s number one TV gossip source, will be on hand to give a run down of who appeared with whom, what they were wearing and who should be crowned “best/worst dressed.” Of course, there is also the lengthy list of parties going on in addition to the 10 official inaugural balls the Obamas are scheduled to attend. Jay-Z even has his own concert scheduled, “An Evening with Jay-Z,” with admission tickets ranging from $100-500. Guess what his opening song will be?

 

After Bush’s 2005 inauguration, critics suggested the millions spent would have been better used to help victims of the Indonesian tsunami which devastated that nation in late December 2004; killing nearly 200,000 and leaving the country in much need of international help.

 

Four years later, some are questioning this year’s display of inaugural excess, i.e. “big pimpin,” during the time of America’s budget, economic and housing crises. Such unnecessary expense, critics say, is completely out of place given the increasing number of companies filing bankruptcy or shutting down and leaving thousands across the country unemployed. Not to mention that states like California are requesting financial assistance from Washington; the same kind given to banking institutions in last year’s “bailout plan.” Other states, like Colorado, are asking government employees to take time off without pay to help cut down on expenses yet Obama is riding into the White House on the promise of “change” but little change is apparent in the inaugural process.

 

What “change” it would have been if the incoming president had ditched the grand plans typically followed by those entering the White House and instead said, “The new first family wants to set the tone and example in these trying economic times and we’ve decided to have a simple swearing-in ceremony followed by an afternoon of feeding D.C.’s homeless population.” The homeless who, by the way, reportedly have been removed (i.e., cleared out), from the vicinity of the White House, Capital, and National Mall in preparation for the ‘big event.’ Could they not also benefit from Obama’s inaugural message? Maybe not since the “poor” were rarely mentioned during the campaign.

 

This 2009 Cadillac is the new presidential limousine which will escort Obama to the inauguration.  It is said to be built like a tank, specially for his security needs.
This 2009 Cadillac is the new presidential limousine which will escort Obama to the inauguration. It is said to be built like a tank, specially for his security needs.

 

The homeless were kicked to the curb to make room for the production featuring the Obamas, Hollywood, vendors looking to capitalize, and thousands of supporters from near and far coming to cheer on and witness history. During the days of celebration, concert promoters will also benefit by taking advantage of all the singers gathered together in one location, and bars/night clubs will also gain by being the places where the “elite and their hangers-on” will gather each night for the “A-lister” after parties; not to mention the numbers of expensive hotels in D.C. and surrounding areas that will be filled to capacity.

 

The country’s collapsing economically and per the November words of Colin Powell a ‘generated international crisis’ is going to hit America on Jan. 21 or 22, (or within 6 months according to Joe Biden), nevertheless, “party on” and “big pimpin” seem to be the motto of the times. Maybe instead of a big celebration, Obama and Biden should be preparing the public for whatever it is they foresaw coming last fall. On the other hand, maybe the pair want to enjoy the cheers while they can, given this prediction Biden made weeks ago about how supporters would react to the Obama administration’s moves: “….. remember St. Peter denied Christ thrice … We don’t need anybody denying us, this is gonna be tough. There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go ‘whoa, wait a minute, I don’t know about that decision……’ Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right…..”

 © 2009 – All Rights Reserved – The Black House News
Unlimited online distribution allowed with acknowledgement of bhonline.org as the source

>>>>>

Visit the Gallery page to view over 100 pictures from the State of the Black World Conference taken by Lens of Ansar and BHN.

>>>>>